Based on a systematic review of scientific studies dating back nearly 70 years, researchers at Johns Hopkins Medicine and collaborating institutions suggest that ambulation—walking or exercising without assistance—is not sufficient alone as a preventive measure against venous thromboembolism (VTE), a potentially deadly condition in which a blood clot forms, often in the deep veins of the leg, groin or arm (known as a deep vein thrombosis) and may dislodge. If that happens, the clot will travel via the bloodstream to lodge in the lungs and cause tissue damage or death from reduced oxygen (known as a pulmonary embolism).Read:Virus at ‘turning point’ in Europe, hitting at-risk groups
The researchers presented their findings in the Dec. 8, 2020, issue of the Canadian Medical Association Journal Open.
According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, VTE annually affects some 300,000 to 600,000 individuals in the United States, and kills between 60,000 to 100,000 of those stricken. Among the groups at highest risk are hospitalized patients, especially those who undergo surgery.
Since the 1950s, ambulation—in the form of walking or foot/leg exercises—as soon and as often as possible following surgery has been recommended as a means of reducing the threat of VTE in high-risk patients. The latest study was conducted to see if ambulation is enough or if other measures—primarily medications known as anticoagulants or blood thinners—are needed.
The researchers reviewed nearly 21,000 scientific papers from 1951 through April 2020 and used predefined scoring criteria to select the 18 most relevant studies. These consisted of eight retrospective and two prospective studies, seven randomized clinical trials and one secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial.
“Our systematic review revealed little evidence to support ambulation alone as an adequate means of preventing VTEs,” says Elliott Haut, M.D., Ph.D., associate professor of surgery at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and senior author of the study.Read:Czechs enter 2nd lockdown to avoid health system collapse
The findings, Haut says, are concerning because ambulation is commonly thought to be effective as the sole prophylaxis used to avoid VTEs. In fact, he adds, several national and international clinical guidelines recommend this course of action.
“It’s a mistaken belief that often leads to doctors discontinuing what they perceive as unnecessary medication or nurses presenting ambulation as an alternative prophylaxis to patients,” says study lead author Brandyn Lau, M.P.H., assistant professor of radiology and radiological science at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. “On the contrary, there is overwhelming evidence supporting medications to prevent VTE in nearly every applicable population admitted to a hospital.”
Haut, Lau and their collaborators hope these findings will help change the long-standing misconception that ambulation can prevent VTEs on its own and persuade physicians to take a more comprehensive approach.Read:Study sheds light on how microbiomes might recover from biodiversity loss
Hospital penalties based on total number of blood clots may be unfairly imposed
Brandyn D. Lau et al. Effectiveness of ambulation to prevent venous thromboembolism in patients admitted to hospital: a systematic review, CMAJ Open (2020). DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20200003
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Looking back decades shows hospitalized patients need more than movement to prevent dangerous clots (2021, January 19)
retrieved 20 January 2021
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.